Search results
109 results ordered by
Contractual interpretation rectification not possible purely for a tax benefit
MV Promotions Ltd and another v Telegraph Media Group Ltd and another [2020] EWHC 1357 (Ch)
Read moreContractual interpretation: the dangers of inconsistency between formulae and worked examples
Altera Voyageur Production Limited v Premier Oil E&P UK Ltd [2020] EWHC 1891 (Comm)
Read moreWish.com: sexually explicit in-app ads deemed offensive and inappropriately targeted
Will an ad of a sexually graphic nature be deemed to be inappropriately targeting consumers and causing harm and offence if it appears on general audience platforms?
Read morePlayrix: gameplay footage must be representative of the gaming experience
When advertising a game, can you use gameplay footage which does not actually feature in the game, or only features to a limited degree?
Read moreP&G: verification requirements in comparative advertising campaigns
How much detail do you need to include to meet the verification requirements under the CAP Code when making comparisons with identifiable competitors?
Read moreBOXT: ‘next day delivery’ and comparative pricing claims
How careful do you need to be with “next day delivery” claims? And is one product comparison enough when making a price comparison claim?
Read moreRestrictive covenants: restraint of trade and bespoke contracts
Quantum Advisory Ltd v Quantum Actuarial LLP [2020] EWHC 1072 (Comm)
Read moreSky UK: clarity over upfront costs and different fees charged to different groups
Do you need to include additional upfront costs in the main body of your ad? And how clear do you need to be about different fees being charged to different groups of consumers (eg existing vs new customers)?
Read moreASA - Advertising to children: Inappropriate targeting
Will an age warning be enough if placed before a scary ad?
Read moreStay connected and subscribe to our latest insights and views
Subscribe Here